A House committee easily passed a bill, 18-1, prohibiting restrictions on where sex offenders can live yesterday, noting that judges have twice ruled residency restrictions unconstitutional. Still, lawmakers predicted a tough fight in the Senate, which has rejected similar bills before. Full Article
Related posts
-
Meta cracks down on teen “sextortion” on Facebook, Instagram
Source: arstechnica.com 11/21/22 Teens will finally have a way to proactively stop the spread of intimate... -
FBI finds sharp rise in online extortion of teens tricked into sending sexually explicit photos
Source: pbs.org 12/19/22 WASHINGTON (AP) — The FBI sounded the alarm Monday about an explosive increase... -
NE: Dodge County sex offenders face challenges in registering
Source: fremonttribune.com 12/20/22 Convicted sex offenders in Fremont and Dodge County are required to register with...

As I see more and more judges adhering to the state constitutions, I’m more and more impressed by those who founded them long ago and these judges who respect their content.
I might add it’s also quite refreshing when lawmakers learn to do the right thing even when it’s unpopular.
OMG! If something is unconstitutional in NH isn’t it unconstitutional in California???
Maybe if we ask nicely we can get New Hamshires house committee to educate Californias house committee!!!!!!