While sex offenders fight for a shot off the registry, opponents raise safety concerns

Admin

A federal judge declared Colorado’s sex-offender registry unconstitutional earlier this month, ruling that making sex-offenders’ addresses, ages and photos accessible to the public is cruel and unusual punishment. Now, an effort to reform California’s own sex-offender registry is raising questions and concerns. Full Article

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of
We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
  4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  10. Please do not post in all Caps.
  11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
  15. Please do not solicit funds
  16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

11 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Nice read, minus the gibberish that Paul Kelly spews.

0
Reply

Klauss: “It felt like the systems he helped build to protect children were unraveling, the pendulum swinging against his life’s work.”

Nobody twisted your arm to start a misguided and misdirected crusade to witch hunt a segment of society to avenge your daughter’s death in the first place. All these child safety advocates need to find a way to make peace with their losses and find a way to live with it and stop projecting their hate and vengeance!

0
Reply
View Replies (5)

“All of a sudden, for people who were supposed to be punished one way or another for long periods of time, it’s all well and done,” Klaas says

Even the people fighting to keep the registry know it is punishment. It’s time for the Supreme Court to accept it’s intent was punishment regardless of what legislatures claim.

0
Reply
View Replies (1)

Now everyone says it is punishment.
I think those lawyer should quote all those lawmakers saying that “those are PUNISHMENT”! it is right there on white paper and black ink. (black and white)

0
Reply

I appreciated article, but felt like punching a hole in a wall after reading that idiot Kelly’s comments. I bet he’s one of the under reported crimes he’s talking about. Nothing worse than a self rightous cop in a position of influence.

0
Reply